Bartram, D. J. (1974). The role of visual and semantic codes in
object naming.
Cognitive Psychology, 6, 325-356.
Bhatt, R. S., Wasserman, E. A., Reynolds, W. F. Jr., & Knauss, K. S. (1988).
Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples
from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 219-234.
Biederman, I. (1972). Perceiving real-world
scenes. Science, 177, 77-80.
Biederman, I., & Bar, M. (1999). One-show viewpoint invariance in matching novel
objects. Vision Research, 39, 2885-2899.
Biederman, I., & Blickle, T. (1985). The perception of objects with deleted contours.
Unpublished manuscript.
Biederman, I. (1987). Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image
understanding.
Psychological Review, 94, 115-147.
Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1991). Evidence for complete translational and reflectional
invariance in visual object priming. Perception, 20, 585-593.
Biederman, I., & Cooper, E. E. (1992). Size invariance in visual object priming.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 121-133.
Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1993). Recognizing depth-rotated objects: Evidence
and conditions for three-dimensional viewpoint invariance. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and Performance, 19, 1162-1182.
Biederman, I., & Gerhardstein, P. C. (1995). Viewpoint-dependent mechanisms in visual
object recognition: Reply to Tarr and Bülthoff (1995). Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1506-1514.
Biederman, I., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W., Jr. (1973).
Searching for objects in
real-world scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 97, 22-27.
Biederman, I., Ju, G., & Clapper, J. (1985). The perception of partial objects.
Unpublished manuscript, State University of New York at Buffalo.
Biederman, I., Rabinowitz, J., Glass, A. L., & Stacy, E. W., Jr. (1974).
On the
information extracted from a glance at a scene. Journal of Experimental Psychology,
103, 597-600.
Blough, D. S. (1993). Reaction time drifts identify objects of attention in pigeon visual
search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19, 107-120.
Blough, D. S. (2001).
The perception of similarity. In R. G. Cook, (Ed.),
Avian visual cognition [On-line]. Available: pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/dblough/
Brannan, J. R. (Ed.). (1992). Applications of parallel processing in vision.
Amsterdam, NL:Elsevier.
Brown, S. D., & Dooling, R. J. (1993). Perception of conspecific faces by Budgerigars
(Melopsittacus Undulatus): II. Synthetic models. Journal of Comparative Psychology,
107, 48-60.
Cerella, J. (1977). Absence of perspective processing in the pigeon. Pattern Recognition,
9, 65-68.
Cerella, J. (1979). Visual classes and natural categories in the
pigeon. Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 5, 68-77.
Cerella, J. (1980). The pigeon’s analysis of pictures. Pattern Recognition, 12,
1-6.
Cerella, J. (1986). Pigeons and perceptrons. Pattern Recognition, 19, 431-438.
Chase, S. &
Heinemann, E. G. (2001). Exemplar memory and discrimination. In R. G.
Cook, (Ed.), Avian visual
cognition [On-line]. Available: pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/chase/
Chatlosh, D. L., & Wasserman, E. A. (1993). Multidimensional stimulus control in pigeons:
Selective attention and other issues. In T. R. Zentall (Ed.), Animal cognition: A tribute
to Donald A. Riley (pp. 271-292). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Cheng, K. & Spetch,
M. (2001). Landmark-based spatial memory in pigeons.In R. G. Cook, (Ed.),
Avian visual cognition [On-line]. Available: pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/cheng/
Edelman, S., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1992). Orientation dependence in the recognition of
familiar and novel view of three-dimensional objects. Vision Research, 32, 2385-2400.
Ellis, R., Allport, D. A., Humphreys, G. W., Collis, J. (1989).
Varieties of object constancy.
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, A41, 775-796.
Fiser, J., & Biederman, I. (1995). Size invariance in visual object priming of
gray-scale images. Perception, 24, 741-748.
Goodale, M. A., & Milner, A. D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception
and action. Trends in Neurosciences, 15, 20-25.
Grossberg, S., Mingolla, E., & Ross, W. D. (1994). A neural theory of attentive
visual search: Interactions of boundary, surface, spatial, and object
representations.
Psychological Review, 101, 470-479.
Hayward, W. G., & Tarr, M. J. (1997). Testing conditions for viewpoint invariance in
object recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,
23, 1511-1521.
Heinemann, E. G., & Chase, S. (1990). In M. L.
Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, S. M. Kosslyn, & D. B. Mumford (Eds.), Quantitative analysis of behavior: Computational
and clinical approaches to pattern recognition and concept formation: Vol. 9
(pp. 109-126). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., & Cable, C. (1976).
Natural concepts in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2,
285-302.
Jolicoeur, P. (1987). A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape. Memory
and Cognition, 15, 531-543.
Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., & Wasserman, E. A. [Size invariance in the
pigeon]. Unpublished raw data.
Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1996).
Effects of spatial rearrangement
of object components on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of the
Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 465-475
Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., & Wasserman, E.A.
(1996). The what and
where of the pigeon's processing of complex visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior
Processes, 22, 60-67.
Kirkpatrick-Steger, K., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1998).
Effects of geon deletion,
scrambling, and movement on picture recognition in pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Animal Behavior Processes, 24, 34-46.
Kosslyn, S. M. (1988). Aspects of a cognitive neuroscience of mental
imagery. Science, 240,
1621-1626.
Lashley, K. S. (1938). The mechanism of vision: XV.
Preliminary studies of the rat’s capacity for detailed vision. Journal of General Psychology, 18, 123-193.
Livingstone, M., & Hubel, D. (1988). Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: Anatomy,
physiology, and perception. Science, 240, 740-749.
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Bülthoff, H. H., & Poggio, T. (1994).
View-dependent object
recognition by monkeys. Current Biology, 4, 401-414.
Lombardi, C. M., & Delius, J. D. (1990). Size invariance in visual pattern
recognition by pigeons. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, S. M. Kosslyn, & D. B.
Mumford (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Behavioral approaches to pattern
recognition and concept formation: Vol. 8 (pp. 41-65). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum.
Lumsden, E. A. (1977). Generalization of an operant response to photographs and drawings/
silhouettes of a three-dimensional object at various orientations. Bulletin of the Psychonomic
Society, 10, 405-407.
Mishkin, M., & Appenzeller, T. (1987). The anatomy of memory. Scientific American,
256, 80-89.
Peissig, J. J., Young, M. E., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (2000).
Seeing things from a
different angle: The pigeons recognition of single geons rotated in depth. Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 115-132.
Riley, D. A., & Roitblat, H. L. (1978). Selective attention and related cognitive processes
in pigeons. In S. H. Hulse, H. Fowler, & W. K. Honig (Eds.), Cognitive processes in
animal behavior (pp. 249-276). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1972). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science,
171, 701-703.
Skinner, B. F. (1935). The generic nature of the concepts of stimulus and response. The Journal
of General Psychology, 12, 40-65.
Tarr, M. J., & Bülthoff, H. H. (1995). Is human object recognition better described
by geon structural descriptions or multiple views? Comment on Biederman and Gerhardstein
(1993).
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 1494-1505.
Tarr, M. J., & Pinker, S. (1989). Mental rotation and orientation dependence in shape
recognition.
Cognitive Psychology, 21, 233-282.
Tarr, M. J., Williams, P., Hayward, W. G., & Gauthier, I. (1998). Three-dimensional
object recognition is viewpoint dependent. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 275-277.
Tinbergen, N. (1951). The study of instinct.
Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press.
Ullman, S. (1989). Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object
recognition.
Cognition, 32, 193-253.
Ungerleider, L. G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems: Separation of appearance
and location of objects. In D. L. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W.
Mansfield (Eds.), Analysis of visual behavior (pp. 549-586). Cambridge,
MA: MIT Press.
Urcuioli, P. (2001).
Categorization & acquired equivalence. In R. G. Cook, (Ed.),
Avian visual cognition [On-line]. Available: pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/urcuioli/
Van Hamme, L. J., Wasserman, E. A., & Biederman, I. (1992).
Discrimination of contour-deleted
images by pigeons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 387-399.
Wasserman, E. A., Gagliardi, J. L., Cook, B. R., Kirkpatrick-Steger,
K., Astley, S. L., & Biederman, I. (1996). The pigeon’s
recognition of drawings of depth-rotated stimuli. Journal of Experimental
Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 205-221.
Wasserman, E. A., Grosch, J. & Nevin, J. A. (1982). Effects of
signaled retention intervals on
pigeon short-term memory. Animal Learning & Behavior, 10, 330-338.
Wasserman, E. A., Kirkpatrick-Steger,
K., Van Hamme, L. J., & Biederman, I. (1993). Pigeons are sensitive
to the spatial organization of complex visual stimuli. Psychological
Science, 4, 336-341.
Watanabe, S., & Ito, Y. (1991). Discrimination of individuals in pigeons. Bird Behaviour,
9, 20-29.
Zeki, S. (1993). A vision of the brain. Oxford, U.
K.:
Blackwell.
