Urcuioli References

Astley, S., & Wasserman, E. A. (1992). Categorical discrimination and generalization in pigeons: All negative stimuli are not created equal. Journal of Experimental Psychology:  Animal Behavior Processes, 18, 193-207.

Bhatt, R. S., Wasserman, E. A., Reynolds, W. F., Jr., & Knauss, K. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categorization of both familiar and novel examples from four classes of natural and artificial stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 219-234.

Blough, D. S. (2001). The perception of similarity. In R. G. Cook  (Ed.), Avian visual cognition [On-line]. Available: pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/dblough/

 Brodigan, D. L., & Peterson, G. B. (1976). Two-choice conditional discrimination performance of pigeons as a function of reward expectancy, prechoice delay, and domesticity. Animal Learning & Behavior, 4, 121-124.

Catania, A. C. (1996). On the origins of behavior structure. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 3-12). Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.

Cole, P. D., & Honig, W. K. (1994). Transfer of a discrimination by pigeons (Columba livia) between pictured locations and the represented environments. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 108, 189-198.

Cook R. G. (2001). Hierarchical stimulus processing in pigeons.  In R. G. Cook  (Ed.), Avian visual cognition [On-line]. Available: pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/cook/

 Edwards, C. A., Jagielo, J. A., Zentall, T. R., & Hogan, D. E. (1982). Acquired equivalence and distinctiveness in matching-to-sample by pigeons: Mediation by reinforcer-specific expectancies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 8, 244-259.

Grant, D. S. & Kelly, R. (2001). Anticipation and short-term retention in pigeons. In R. G. Cook  (Ed.), Avian visual cognition [On-line]. Available: pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/grant/

 Herrnstein, R. J. (1990). Levels of stimulus control: A functional approach Cognition, 37, 133-166.

 Herrnstein, R. J., & Loveland, D. H. (1964). Complex visual concept in the pigeon. Science, 146, 549-551.

 Herrnstein, R. J., Loveland, D. H., & Cable, C. (1976). Natural concepts in pigeonsJournal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 2, 285-302.

 Honey, R. C., & Hall, G. (1989). The acquired equivalence and distinctiveness of cuesJournal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 338-346.

Huber, L. (2001). Visual categorization in pigeons. In R. G. Cook  (Ed.), Avian visual cognition [On-line]. Available: pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/huber/

 Hull, C. L. (1939). The problem of stimulus equivalence in behavior theory. Psychological Review, 46, 9-30.

Kaiser, D. H., Sherburne, L. M., Steirn, J. N., & Zentall, T. R. (1997). Perceptual learning in pigeons: Decreased ability to discriminate samples mapped onto the same comparison in many-to-one matching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 378-381.

Keller, F. S., & Schoenfeld, W. N. (1950).  Principles of psychology.  New York, NY:  Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Kirkpatrick, K. (2001). Object recognition. In R. G. Cook  (Ed.), Avian visual cognition [On-line]. Available: pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/kirkpatrick/

Lea, S. E. G. (1984). In what sense do pigeons learn concepts?  In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, & H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 263-276). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lionello, K. M., & Urcuioli, P. J. (1998). Control by sample location in pigeons' matching-to-sampleJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 235-251.

Manabe, K., Kawashima, T., & Staddon, J. E. R. (1995). Differential vocalization in budgerigars: Towards an experimental analysis of namingJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 63, 111-126.

Peterson, G. B. (1984). How expectancies guide behavior. In H. L. Roitblat, T. G. Bever, and H. S. Terrace (Eds.), Animal cognition (pp. 135-148). Hillsdale, NJ:  Lawrence Erlbaum.

Roberts, W. A. (1996). Stimulus generalization and hierarchical structure in categorization by animals. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 35-54). Amsterdam, NL:  Elsevier.

Rosch, E., Mervis, C. B., Gray, W. D., Johnson, D. M., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 382-439.

Saunders, K. J., & Williams, D. C. (1998). Do parakeets exhibit derived stimulus control?  Some thoughts on experimental control procedures. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 70, 321-324.

Saunders, K. J., Williams, D. C., & Spradlin, J. E. (1996). Derived stimulus control:  Are there differences among procedures and processes?  In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 93-109). Amsterdam, NL:  Elsevier.

Spradlin, J. E., Cotter, V. W., & Baxley, N. (1973). Establishing a conditional discrimination without direct training:  A study of transfer with retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 556-566.

Urcuioli, P. J. (1990). Some relationships between outcome expectancies and sample stimuli in pigeons’ delayed matching. Animal Learning & Behavior, 18, 302-314.

Urcuioli, P. J. (1996). Acquired equivalences and mediated generalization in pigeon’s matching-to-sample. In T. R. Zentall & P. M. Smeets (Eds.), Stimulus class formation in humans and animals (pp. 55-70). Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier.

Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., & DeMarse, T. (1995). Transfer to derived sample-comparison relations by pigeons following many-to-one versus one-to-many matching with identical training relations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48, 158-178.

Urcuioli, P. J., Zentall, T. R., Jackson-Smith, P., & Steirn, J. N. (1989). Evidence for common coding in many-to-one matching:  Retention, intertrial interference, and transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology:  Animal Behavior Processes, 15, 264-273.

Wasserman, E. A., & Bhatt, R. S. (1992). Conceptualization of natural and artificial stimuli by pigeons. In W. K. Honig & J. G. Fetterman (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of stimulus control (pp. 203-223). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Wasserman, E. A., DeVolder, C. L., & Coppage, D. J. (1992). Nonsimilarity-based conceptualization in pigeons. Psychological Science, 3, 374-379.

Wasserman, E. A., Kiedinger, R. E., & Bhatt, R. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons:  Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories.  Journal of  Experimental Psychology:  Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 235-246.

Younger, B. A., & Cohen, L. B. (1985). How infants form categories. In G. H. Bower (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 211-247). New York, NY: Academic Press.

Young, M. E. & Wasserman, E.A. (2001). Stimulus control in complex arrays. In R. G. Cook  (Ed.), Avian visual cognition [On-line]. Available: pigeon.psy.tufts.edu/avc/young/

Zentall, T. R. (1998). Symbolic representation in animals:  Emergent stimulus relations in conditional discrimination learning. Animal Learning & Behavior, 26, 363-377.